Tiny CorpCompare
TinyCorp vs Conductor
Both run AI coding agents in parallel on your Mac. Conductor gives you fast, polished workspaces. TinyCorp gives you a team that plans, reviews, and asks before it merges.
| Feature | Conductor | TinyCorpPRIVATE BETA |
|---|---|---|
| What you get | Parallel workspaces | A team with roles, chat and a board |
| Agents talk to each other | No | Yes, in threads |
| Planning before code | No | PM plans with you |
| Review between agents | Diff review by you | Line-by-line on the PR |
| Merge gate / autonomy levels | You merge | Supervised / Managed / Autonomous |
| Per-repo rules | No | Local only / PR only / merges |
| Runs on your subscription | Yes (or API keys) | Yes, never API keys |
| Cloud option | Conductor Cloud (microVMs) | No — nothing leaves your machine |
| Platforms | macOS | macOS, Windows (native & WSL) |
| Price | Free; Pro $50/mo; Teams $60/user | Free in beta |
Compared on 2026-09-22 from each product's public pages. · Also compare: TinyCorp vs Orca
An honest take
Two good tools.
Different jobs.
When to pick Conductor
You want several solo sessions running side by side, and you are happy to be the one who reviews every diff.
- You work alone and review everything yourself
- You want a cloud option to run agents off your machine
- You prefer polished workspaces over a process
When to pick TinyCorp
You want planning, peer review and gated merges, so you can oversee five to ten agents without reading every line first.
- The PM plans with you before any code is written
- Another Employee reviews each PR line by line
- You set per-repo rules and decide what merges
Your next big thing starts with a tiny team.
Open the app. Hire your first coworker. See what happens.